This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here.
The past few years have not been easy on many American schools. Large infusions of federal funding helped alleviate pandemic-era pains—but that money is drying up.
First, here are three new stories from The Atlantic:
A Steep Fiscal Cliff
Summer break is on the horizon, but many schools are already bracing themselves for what next year will look like. It isn’t a pretty picture: By the time classes resume in the fall, budget reductions and teacher layoffs will be under way in some districts.
Across the country, the cuts have already started. District officials in Arlington, Texas, announced plans to remove 275 positions at the end of this school year. Dozens of teachers in Providence, Rhode Island, are getting laid off. Other districts are letting attrition do its work: Many schools are simply not replacing teachers who retire or quit, which is creating its own disruptions for students, Marguerite Roza, the director of the Edunomics Lab and a research professor at Georgetown University, told me. We may soon see schools shutting down altogether, she added; already, Seattle school officials are proposing to close about 23 elementary schools by the 2025–26 school year.
These seismic disruptions to classrooms come as a perfect storm sweeps through many American schools. Inflation, falling school enrollments, and recent state-tax cuts are all exacerbated by the imminent expiration of a huge tranche of COVID-era federal funds, known as the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER), which is set to end in September. Issued in three installments—$13 billion in the CARES Act in March 2020, $54 billion in the December 2020 stimulus package, and $122 billion more in the American Rescue Plan Act in March 2021—the ESSER funds made up the largest-ever single federal investment in public education, as students were beginning to fall behind in their reading and math skills, and test scores started to drop. Lower-income students were prioritized for funding; by the fall of 2022, annual federal spending per student had more than doubled in some high-poverty districts.
This infusion of federal cash allowed schools to boost salaries (at a time when many districts struggled to find staff), make improvements to facilities, and hire support staff such as nurses and social workers who could help students during a mental- and public-health crisis. Districts always knew that the money was temporary, so many focused on adding short-term programs and positions with the understanding that, come September 2024, they would be back to relying on state and local governments for the bulk of their funding.
Still, some schools used the federal funds to hire full-time teachers without a clear sense of how they would pay their salaries long-term. That went against most expert advice, my colleague Adam Harris told me, “but in some places it was simply unavoidable,” he explained. “The looming layoffs were always top of mind, but some districts were understaffed to begin with, and so hiring additional teachers or staff was a part of being able to properly serve students.” He noted that districts were hoping to find other funding sources for their new full-time roles; that may still be possible in some areas, but schools with more low-income students are looking down a steep fiscal cliff. (Because they received a bigger share of federal funding compared with more affluent districts, they will feel the difference more once the extra money is gone.)
The ESSER guidelines stipulate that schools cannot carry over funding to future years (unless they apply for and receive an extension), so school districts will need to finalize plans for the remaining funds soon—or lose them entirely. But budgeting will likely be tough: After struggling to find staff during the height of the pandemic—and, in many cases, paying premiums to recruit and retain teachers—districts are scrambling to shrink their costs. Though most of them are better prepared to handle the budget shortfall today than they were a year ago, Adam explained, they still face brutal choices. Even the districts that aren’t considering layoffs will have to weigh which programs are important enough to keep. Do they cut mental-health resources? Summer enrichment courses? Food pantries for low-income students? “Those became important services that students and staff relied on,” Adam said, “and students may be worse off without them.”
It has been a “very messy few years financially for school districts,” Roza told me. Though some federal money will still be sloshing around this fall, it won’t last. And we may see an even larger wave of cuts the following school year. The big question, Roza said, is whether schools are going in with clear eyes this budget season. “If we’re making disruptive cuts now because we didn’t plan ahead, then that’s the bigger tragedy.”
Related:
Today’s News
- During Donald Trump’s New York criminal trial, one of his attorneys cross-examined Michael Cohen, Trump’s former lawyer, and attempted to cast doubt on Cohen’s testimony.
- The House Judiciary Committee voted to advance a contempt-of-Congress resolution against Attorney General Merrick Garland, who refused to comply with a subpoena to turn over the audio recordings of Special Counsel Robert Hur interviewing President Joe Biden.
- The Biden administration submitted a proposal to reclassify marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III, which would reduce some federal-level restrictions on the drug but would not legalize or decriminalize it across the country.
Dispatches
- Time-Travel Thursdays: “One of the thrills of reading Sylvia Plath is the abundance of versions to choose from,” Sophie Gilbert writes.
- The Weekly Planet: Hawthorns once proliferated wildly across eastern North America, but now they’re dying out, Robert Langellier writes. Should they be saved?
Explore all of our newsletters here.
Evening Read
The Cruel Social Experiment of Reality TV
By Sophie Gilbert
For 15 months, a wannabe comedian called Tomoaki Hamatsu (nicknamed “Nasubi,” or “eggplant,” in reference to the length of his head) has been confined, naked, to a single room filled with magazines, and tasked with surviving—and winning his way out, if he could hit a certain monetary target—by entering competitions to win prizes. The entire time, without his knowledge or consent, he’s also been broadcast on a variety show called Susunu! Denpa Shōnen.
Before he’s freed, Nasubi is blindfolded, dressed for travel, transported to a new location, and led into a small room that resembles the one he’s been living in. Wearily, accepting that he’s not being freed but merely moved, he takes off his clothes as if to return to his status quo. Then, the walls collapse around him to reveal the studio, the audience, the stage, the cameras. Confetti flutters through the air. Nasubi immediately grabs a pillow to conceal his genitals. “My house fell down,” he says, in shock. The audience cackles at his confusion. “Why are they laughing?” he asks. They laugh even harder.
More From The Atlantic
Culture Break
Watch (or skip). Back to Black, the new Amy Winehouse biopic (out tomorrow in theaters) renders her life with some intelligence and painterly craft, Spencer Kornhaber writes. But it also turns “a complex human being into a generic image.”
Listen. In the latest episode of Radio Atlantic, our staff writer Katherine J. Wu discusses the possible future in which male contraceptives are readily available and a routine part of men’s health care.
Stephanie Bai contributed to this newsletter.
When you buy a book using a link in this newsletter, we receive a commission. Thank you for supporting The Atlantic.
