The Asics Gel-Kayano 31 and Asics Gel-Cumulus 26 are two standout models in Asics’ running lineup, each aimed at different types of runners.
The Kayano 31 is known for its stability features, while the Cumulus 26 offers a more versatile, cushioned ride.
In this comparison, we’ll break down their key differences in the sole unit, upper design, and overall performance. Let’s dive in and see which one might suit your running needs better.
Verdict
The Asics Gel-Cumulus 26 is a cushioned daily trainer that is an everyday shoe for most runners of all abilities. It has a great rocker ride that is both smooth and soft. The heel tab can rub the back of your ankle, though, which would definitely bother some people.
Overall, the ASICS Gel-Kayano 31 is a solid choice for runners seeking stability and comfort without sacrificing performance. Its supportive midsole, adaptive upper, and durable outsole combine to offer a reliable platform for long-distance training.
Recommended for
Daily training
Daily training
Cushioning type
Responsive/balanced
Balanced/plush
Cushioning amount
Medium cushioning
Highly cushioned
Stability
some stability
very stable
Sizing
true to size
true to size
Retail price
US$139.95
US$164.95
The Gel-Kayano 31 is built with stability in mind, making it a good choice for runners who over-pronate. It features Asics’ 4D Guidance System and FF Blast+ cushioning, which provide a solid, supportive platform. The higher stack height (40 mm in the heel, 30 mm in the forefoot) offers substantial cushioning and feels stable but slightly heavy for some runners. It’s well-suited for those longer runs where extra support helps keep your form in check.
On the other hand, the Gel-Cumulus 26 is more about balance and flexibility. It’s equipped with FF Blast+ ECO foam and PureGel in the heel, offering a cushioned yet responsive feel. The stack height is slightly lower (34 mm in the heel, 26 mm in the forefoot), making it feel lighter and more agile. This setup is ideal for neutral runners who want a shoe that works well for both easy runs and picking up the pace when needed.
To sum up, if stability and support are your top priorities, especially for longer distances, the Kayano 31 is a solid option. If you’re looking for something lighter with a touch more versatility, the Cumulus 26 might be a better fit.
In terms of upper design, the Gel-Kayano 31 uses a structured engineered mesh that gives a snug, supportive fit. This is especially beneficial for those who need stability, as it helps keep the foot locked in place during the run. The design focuses on security without sacrificing comfort, but it can feel a bit bulkier.
The Gel-Cumulus 26, however, features a stretchy engineered mesh that offers a softer, more flexible fit. It feels lighter on the foot and adapts well to different foot shapes. One potential downside is the heel tab, which some runners have found uncomfortable during longer runs due to rubbing on the ankle.
In short, if you prefer a snug, more structured upper, the Kayano 31 delivers that stability-focused fit. If you lean toward a softer, more flexible feel, the Cumulus 26 offers a more adaptable upper design.
If you’re someone who benefits from stability—perhaps you overpronate or run long distances—the Gel-Kayano 31 is designed with you in mind. It provides the support and cushioning you need to maintain good form over extended miles, though it may feel a bit bulkier.
For those who prefer a neutral, cushioned shoe that can handle a variety of runs, the Gel-Cumulus 26 is more versatile. It’s lighter, more flexible, and can easily transition between different paces. This makes it a good all-around option for daily training without the added structure of the Kayano.
In conclusion, the Kayano 31 is the right pick for runners needing stability, while the Cumulus 26 is a great choice for those wanting a lighter, more versatile trainer.
