The A.P. reported that it adhered to Israel’s military censorship rules, including restrictions on broadcasting troop movements that could put soldiers at risk, and that the feed largely showed smoke rising over Gaza. It said officials had not flagged the positioning of its camera in southern Israel as problematic, but they had noted that its images appeared live on Al Jazeera.
It also reported that the Israeli authorities had conveyed a verbal order last week to shut down the live feed, but it did not comply.
As a prominent wire service, The A.P. makes its content available to subscribers around the world.
Yair Lapid, the leader of Israel’s parliamentary opposition, had blasted the Communications Ministry for confiscating The A.P.’s equipment, calling the move “insanity.”
“This is not Al Jazeera. This is an American media outlet that has won” dozens of Pulitzer Prizes, he said. “This government is acting as if it decided to ensure at all costs that Israel will be ostracized all around the world.”
In Israel, Al Jazeera’s Arabic-language coverage has frequently come under criticism for amplifying Hamas’s perspective.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel and other Israeli officials have called the network a “mouthpiece” for Hamas, which led the Oct. 7 attacks on Israel from Gaza that set off the war. That day, Al Jazeera repeatedly reported statements from Hamas officials calling for a violent uprising in the occupied West Bank.
Al Jazeera has said that Israel’s decision to shutter its operations in the country violated “the basic right to access of information.” It has asserted that it hadn’t violated professional news standards.
The Foreign Press Association, which represents Israeli and Palestinian journalists working for international news organizations, had called the seizure of The A.P.’s equipment an “outrageous” decision that prevents the agency from “providing crucial images of northern Gaza to all other media outlets around the world.”
“Israel’s move today is a slippery slope,” it said in a statement on Tuesday. “Israel could block other international news agencies from providing live footage of Gaza. It also could allow Israel to block media coverage of virtually any news event on vague security grounds.”
Under the new law, if the prime minister deems a foreign news outlet was “concretely” undermining Israel’s national security, the government can temporarily close its offices, confiscate its equipment, remove it from Israeli cable and satellite television providers, and block access to any of the channel’s online platforms hosted on servers in Israel or owned by Israeli entities.
Johnatan Reiss and Gaya Gupta contributed reporting.
